Hazards Process Safety Conference
Programme
If you're attending Hazards 34, download the conference app before you arrive!
This year, we're excited to introduce a new tool to maximise your conference experience: the Hazards 34 Conference App sponsored by Rolls Royce and powered by EventMobi. This is how you get the most out of Hazards 34. Download the conference app for real-time updates and personalised schedules. Explore everything the event has to offer—all from your phone.
To start, download and install the EventMobi from your app store. Then enter ‘hazards34’ in the box which says, ‘Enter Code’. This will take you to the Hazards 34 app. Enter the email address you used to register for the conference and enable push notifications.
From Monday 28 October, this programme will not be updated online. To see the latest version of the programme, download the conference app.
Tuesday 5 November
10:30–12:30 Workshops
An Introduction to Bowties, Critical Barrier Management and Barrier Health Through an Interactive Board Game - presented by Wolters Kluwer
Maximum: 65
During this workshop, you’ll get a recap of the bowtie method while considering critical barrier management and barrier health. You will play an interactive bowtie game in small groups and the concepts of critical barrier management, barrier health will be introduced in rounds of the game. Compete with your peers to see who is best at balancing production with safety by applying these concepts. Are you our next winner? Join us for a fun-filled session!
Grid Scale Battery Energy Storage System Hazards – A Process Safety Approach - presented by IChemE
As electrical energy grids decarbonise through increased renewable generation the intermittency and lack of inertia of renewables leads to an increased reliance on grid-scale energy storage technologies.
In this workshop, we introduce the current landscape of energy storage technologies, showing the current dependence on Li-ion battery systems and the potential for increased use of other chemistries and archetypes, for example flow batteries. Following this we discuss the issues and challenges of these two technologies, focusing on the widely adopted Li-ion battery. The hazards of Li-ion batteries, particularly those related to thermal runaway, are presented from a cell to systems level. Past Li-ion BESS incidents are discussed in relation to these hazards to understand the most common root causes. Given an overview of current codes and standards for BESS at different levels in the built environment a holistic approach adopting process safety and systems thinking is applied to address gaps in BESS hazards regulatory framework. This holistic approach is then applied to flow batteries to discuss any needs for regulatory differences.
From this workshop, the audience will leave with a greater understating of Li-ion BESSs and their hazards, and be actively involved in addressing gaps in BESS safety standards.
Curiosity Killed The Cat… But Saved The Plant - presented by IChemE Safety Centre
Curiosity is a really important human trait, but one that we often undervalue. In this workshop, we will explore the nature of curiosity in safety, and how to make the most of it to get better outcomes. We will discuss biases that can hinder and help, as well as have some fun along the way.
Explore How Digital Twins Are Reshaping Risk Management Practices in Hazardous Industries - presented by Sphera
The objective of the workshop is to:
a) Demonstrate the inherent value of using digital twin technology in hazardous industries.
b) Gain a working understanding of the required data sources needed to accommodate implementation.
c) The benefits of removing data silos and being able to unite information from many different sources and boost integrated collaboration to improve risk management in the facility
d) Discuss with attendees how to turn data into intelligence.
e) Discuss with attendees the challenges in adopting DGTT.
f) Discussion with attendees on lessons learned and best practices.
Hazard Identification Techniques - presented by IChemE
Dr Zsuzsanna Gyenes will discuss the advantages and limitations of a range of Hazard Identification Techniques, inviting audience members to share their own experiences in regard to Inherent Safety study, HAZID, HAZOP and FMECA. The workshop content will be drawn from IChemE’s two-day Hazard Identification Techniques training course.
13:30–13:45 Opening session
Welcome, Eamon Chandler, Chair, Hazards 34 Technical Committee
13:45–14:30 Plenary presentation
Bhopal, 40 Years On
Fiona Macleod, Professor of Process Safety, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, UK
In her presentation, Fiona will mark the 40th anniversary of the Bhopal disaster, the lessons learned and the ongoing issues at the site.
15:15–17:15 Parallel sessions
Hazards Studies
Introducing C3HazOp
Harvey Dearden, SISSuite, UK
‘Computer HazOp’ or CHazOp is a recognized method for assessing risks associated with system architectures, but the actual scope and methodology to be adopted is rather confused with different approaches urged by different practitioners. Common Cause Control HazOp (C3HazOp) provides a highly focused method that cuts down the workload and helps maintain participant engagement, without which the study can be very seriously weakened. This paper will outline the method and report on experience with pilot studies conducted on a user facility.
How Have Hazard Studies Changed Post Covid?
Alison McKay, TUV, UK
Before Covid-19 hazard studies were invariably conducted face-to-face with all the team present in one room. During the Covid-19 lockdowns we proved that we could continue to facilitate good quality hazard studies remotely. This paper discusses how conducting hazard studies has changed, maybe permanently, post Covid with many studies continuing to be carried out remotely, or as a hybrid (partly face-to-face, partly remote).
Effective HAZOP to LOPA Scenario Transition
Dave Green, RPS Group, UK
The question of when to progress scenarios from hazard studies (typically Hazard and Operability Studies) to further risk assessment deriving Safety Integrity Levels is a hot debated topic. This paper builds on hazard study facilitation experiences across many hundreds of hours determining the scenarios which should be transitioned/ reviewed in SIL determination.
A Fault Tree Approach to Assessing the Effectiveness of Non-Physical Safety Measures to Protect Underground Pipelines
Michael Acton, DNV, UK
Underground pipelines undergo a variety of influences that threaten their integrity including external interference, external corrosion, ground movement and material and construction defects. This paper describes the development of the fault tree model to evaluate selected measures chosen by the participating companies as practical options, and the review and analysis of relevant information identified from the published literature and from previous research made available to the project by participating companies.
New Energies
Ensuring Safety and Confidence: Navigating the Transition to Net Zero
Max Walker, HSE, UK
Many of us have been raised in environments where we have been surrounded by, and even worked in, locations with significant hazard risks. While broader society acknowledges these risks as inherent to modern life, it does so with the expectation that independent regulatory bodies will advocate for and monitor businesses' adherence to relevant laws, intervening when standards and performance fall short. This paper will expand on the work HSE is focusing on to understand and analyse the demand for our resources, and how we can achieve the best regulatory outcomes.
Navigating the Hazards of Large-Scale Ammonia Terminals
Karina Almeida Lenero, Gexcon, UK
This paper will discuss the risk resulting from loss of containment scenarios at large ammonia import/ export terminals, focusing on the toxic hazards. It will explore the main scenarios contributing to the toxic risk, in particular releases from bunkering systems and large storage tanks.
Assessment of Risk and Reliability Challenges in Different Value Chain of Hydrogen Systems
Xueli Gao, Institute for Energy Technology, Norway
This paper reviews current risk and reliability assessment methods for hydrogen technologies across the value chain, from production to use, highlighting the importance of managing hydrogen's high flammability for safe deployment and public acceptance. It identifies research needs and gaps, including hazard identification, safety risk management, and human factors analysis, based on industry input and literature.
A Methane Emissions Management System Framework
Tiago Jacques, ANP, Brazil
Methane is considered an important cause in climate change. However, given its value as a viable energy resource, methane emissions from anthropogenic activities represent not only an environmental challenge but also a missed economic opportunity. This paper proposes a novel approach to methane emissions management, aiming to bridge the gap between environmental stewardship and financial benefit.
Digitalisation I
Is AI the Answer?
Carolyn Nicholls, RAS, UK
Artificial intelligence is increasingly changing the way we live our lives. How does it fit with high hazard industry, particularly when it comes to process safety management? What are the advantages of AI for you and your site? Can it help you in mitigating your risks? Is it the panacea you’ve been looking for? This paper will explore the pros and cons of AI in HAZOPs, with a particular focus on the human factors.
ADNOC Offshore – NASR Field Journey Towards Autonomous Operation
Arun Chandran, ADNOC, UAE
This paper outlines ADNOC Offshore - NASR Field's journey towards autonomous operations. Despite its initial design as a "Digital Oil Field" with advanced instrumentation, control and telecom systems, the asset still relies on human oversight. By leveraging its state-of-the-art infrastructure, NASR Field team aims to minimize human-system interaction, enhancing both Health, Safety, and Environment and operating efficiency through a technology-driven, people and process-oriented transformation.
Learning from Accidents
The Questions of Recurring Incidents; Why and How to Stop Them?
Ian Clarke, Swiss Re Corporate Solutions, UK
This presentation will focus on competency validation in the insurance industry, emphasising the importance of ensuring operators perform correctly in both standard and emergency situations. Through examples of preventable incidents, we will explore methods to improve and validate operator training, aiming to enhance decision-making and safety outcomes.
Identification of Drivers of Critical Safety by Leveraging Natural Language Processing
Mohammad Zaid Kamil, Dalhousie University, Canada
This paper introduces a data-driven methodology to assess drivers of critical safety (DCS) in the process industries using natural language processing to extract insights from incident reports. Applied to the US Chemical Safety and Hazard Identification Board database, this approach enhances safety management by automating the identification of DCS and integrating lessons learned into a robust, proactive safety management system.
Crystallising Cognitive Diamonds in a Sugar Factory – How Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) Can Improve learning From Serious Accidents
Ian Pemberton, Human Focus International, UK
This study explores the application of Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) to review a serious accident at a British Sugar manufacturing plant. By focusing on cognitive work, the CTA approach provided deeper insights into the factors contributing to the accident, going beyond the findings of the initial investigation. The analysis also contributed to the development of scenario-based decision-making exercises (DMX) training, shown to improve the cognitive skills linked to the incident. This research highlights how CTA can enhance learning from serious accidents, offering valuable insights into human cognitive factors and supporting skills training for preventing future serious incidents and fatalities (SIFs).
IChemE Membership and Professional Development Drop-in Session
Come and find out how IChemE can help you in your career.
17:30–18:00 Trevor Kletz Lecture
The Process Safety Imperative for a Sustainable World
Marlene Kanga AO FTSE FREng FAICD, Rux Energy
18:30–19:30 Welcome reception in exhibition area
Wednesday 6 November
09:00–09:45 Plenary presentation
New Technologies, Developments and Energy Transition
Professor Andrew Curran, HSE
In his presentation, Andrew will talk about new technologies, developments and energy transition.
09:45–10:30 Plenary presentation
Safety and the Energy Transition – What Changes and What Doesn’t
Clinton McDonald, bp
In his presentation, Clint will talk will explore the transformation of the fuels value chain from its historical roots to modern advancements, focusing on changes in process and personal safety, while also identifying the core elements that remain unchanged.
11:00–13:00 Parallel sessions
Hydrogen Safety 1
Dolphyn Hydrogen: Safety and Regulatory Challenges in the Offshore Production of Hydrogen from Wind
Laura Bond, ERM, UK
This presentation will cover the Dolphyn Hydrogen project, focusing on its innovative offshore hydrogen production, safety design aspects, and lessons learned during FEED. It will address hydrogen safety challenges, the operation of unmanned installations, electrolyser effectiveness in offshore environments, and the approach to compliance within an incomplete regulatory framework, concluding with key findings and next steps.
The Invisible Threat: Navigating the Safety Risks of the Global Hydrogen Economy
Steve Elliott, Schneider Electric, UK
The transition to hydrogen involves significant investment and promises environmental benefits, but also poses new safety risks. This session explores common mistakes, lessons learned, and best practices for managing hydrogen hazards to ensure safe and sustainable operations in the hydrogen value chain.
Hazard Study 0 Case Study: Retrofitting an Industrial Burner for Hydrogen Fuel
Oyinda Gunn, AXIOM, UK
This paper explores the application of Hazard Study 0 (HS0) in retrofitting industrial burners for hydrogen fuel to support decarbonisation in the chemical industry. It presents safety challenges, lessons learnt, and compares different hydrogen-ready burners available on the market.
Risk Assessment & Management 1
Evolving the Hierarchy of Risk Control from Blunt Instrument to Precision Tool for Cutting Risk
Andrew Brazier, AB Risk, UK
This paper presents an expanded hierarchy of risk controls, incorporating inherent safety and emphasizing the role of human actions in managing process safety risks. Through detailed examples, it aims to facilitate a more productive discussion on inherent safety, human factors, and the ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) principle.
Risk Appetite in Heavy Industries, an Insurance Prospective
Soondus Moorhead, CNA Hardy, UK
This presentation will introduce attendees to the fundamentals of specialty insurance in heavy industries, focusing on the role of insurance in promoting process safety and best practices. Key topics include risk transfer, insurable risks, risk appetite, and the importance of applying current industry practices to new sustainable technologies, with insights from CNA Hardy's expertise in the Lloyd’s of London market.
Visualising Risk Reduction: Utilising Weighted Bowtie Diagrams for Enhanced Risk Assessment, Management and Communication
Colin Chambers, HSE, UK
This paper explores the application of Weighted BowTie Diagrams (WBTDs) for risk assessment and effective communication, demonstrating their utility through a case study on preventing overfilling in a bulk fuel storage tank. The study highlights how WBTDs enhance traditional bowtie diagrams by visualizing cumulative risk reduction and barrier effectiveness, improving decision-making and risk management.
Update to the UK Pipeline Quantitative Risk Assessment Guidelines IGEM/TD/2
Michael Acton, DNV, UK
Learn about the key updates in Edition 3 of IGEM/TD/2, which provides refined guidance for Quantitative Risk Assessments of high-pressure natural gas pipelines, incorporating new developments such as the introduction of "Type H" high-density areas and revised failure models. This presentation will cover the expanded guidance for complex locations, updated risk reduction measures, and the latest UK best practices for managing pipeline safety.
Digitalisation II
Remote Operations – Cybersecurity Risk?
Matt Vickers & & Ned Minett, Abbott Risk Consulting (ARC), UK
This presentation will explore the shift towards remote operations in offshore installations, discussing benefits such as reduced risk profiles and decreased need for helicopter transfers through Integrated Onshore Command (IOC). It will also address logistical and security challenges, particularly cybersecurity risks, and propose a pragmatic approach to ensure reliable and safe remote operations in the oil and gas industry.
Accelerating Adoption of AI-Infused Digital HAZOP Assistants
Angus Keddie, Process Safety Matters, UK
Exploring the transformative potential of AI in High Hazard Process Risk Assessment, this presentation examines the historical adoption of technology in safety processes and investigates how AI can enhance HAZOP efficiency. By analysing past technological failures and successes, the session aims to identify strategies for the rapid adoption of AI-enhanced HAZOP tools, ensuring they move from "stranger on the horizon" to integral safety components.
Franklin Medal Winner: How to Use Applied Data Science and Engineering Excellence to Solve Safety, Reliability and Performance Problems
Gus Carroll, Empirysys, UK
There are very seldom right and wrong answers, only choices. Data analytics and AI provide a tremendously powerful means of helping engineers improve process safety and asset reliability and reduce production losses. However, these are simply tools that can rapidly create insight from data, but will never replace the need for experienced engineers to make decisions.
Digital Coating Inspection Portal - AI Driven
Shaheen Al Beshr, ADNOC, UAE
This abstract outlines ADNOC Offshore's implementation of an AI-driven solution using Virtual Tour Laser scan data and 3D processing to create a precise inventory of external corrosion through machine learning. The solution significantly reduces visual inspections, enhances asset visibility, and supports proactive maintenance strategies, ultimately reducing risks and operational costs associated with corrosion management.
Human Factors 1
The Integration of Qualitative Human Factors Safety Critical Task Analysis with Wider Engineering Risk Assessments
Jamie Henderson, Human Reliability Associates, UK
This paper discusses the integration challenges between Safety Critical Task Analysis (SCTA) and engineering risk assessments within UK COMAH regulations. It highlights the recent CIEHF guidance's impact on SCTA practice, proposing a framework for improving dialogue between qualitative SCTAs and quantitative MAH risk assessments to enhance overall risk management effectiveness.
Safety Critical Task Analysis – Lessons from Industry
Derek Porter, Risktec Solutions, UK
This presentation will explore the regulatory expectations and practical challenges of Safety Critical Task Analysis (SCTA), drawing on real-life projects across oil & gas, chemical, nuclear, and manufacturing sectors. It will provide insights into screening procedures, prioritization strategies, and effective implementation measures to mitigate human failures in operational environments.
A Model to Assess the Risk of Organisational Change
Lorraine Braben, Braben Consulting, UK
This paper outlines a practical model for developing a Management of Organisational Change (MoOC) system to meet COMAH requirements, addressing gaps in existing literature by providing clear guidance and categorisation of change types. It aims to assist Hazards delegates in understanding and implementing robust risk assessment processes tailored to high hazard process sites, thereby enhancing safety and compliance with HSE expectations.
Storm Preparedness for Mobile Offshore Drilling Units: An Example of Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Simon Dunford, HSE, UK
This presentation discusses recent HSE investigations into mooring failures on MODUs in the North Sea during storms, highlighting challenges such as uncertain weather forecasts and conflicting production goals. It emphasizes the application of Human Factors insights to enhance decision-making under uncertainty, advocating for proactive preparations and supportive organizational arrangements to mitigate risks and maintain situational awareness in hazardous environments.
Carbon Capture 1
Design Considerations for Pressurised Flare and Vent Systems for Efficient CO2 Management
Hugo Manuel Dias Rodrigues, Siemens, Portugal
This presentation discusses safety challenges in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects, focusing on high CO2 gas field exploitation and the design complexities of disposal systems like flares and vents due to low temperatures and solid CO2 formation during depressurisation. It introduces an innovative approach of segregating high CO2 systems into a pressurised flare header to mitigate blockage risks, with potential applications in Floating Production Storage Offloading facilities and CCS projects.
Lessons Learned from Process and Technical Safety in CCUS Projects
Hugo Siddle, WSP, UK
This paper examines the critical role of Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS) in achieving net zero emissions, emphasising the significant safety challenges associated with large-scale CO2 management. It explores lessons from early-stage CCUS project design, focussing on adapting established oil and gas safety practices to mitigate the unique hazards posed by CO2, including physical effects modelling, risk assessment methodologies, and emergency response strategies.
An Updated Release Model for High-pressure CO2 Pipelines: Validation of Discharge and Dispersion Predictions Against CO2PIPETRANS Experiments
Jan Stene, DNV, UK
This presentation looks at advances in safety for carbon capture and storage (CCS), focusing on the transportation of high-pressure CO2 through long pipelines. Key topics include the development and validation of the extended pipebreak model, addressing initial source term accuracy and its integration with the unified dispersion model (UDM) for assessing CO2 dispersion in the atmosphere, as demonstrated through comprehensive validation against CO2PIPETRANS experiments.
14:00–15:45 Parallel sessions
Processes & Procedures
It’s OK, We Have a Back-up
Roger Stokes, BakerRisk, UK
The presentation addresses the critical need for reliable backup systems in facilities dependent on electrical power and other services for safe operation. It explores historical reliance on emergency pre-plans and highlights real-world case studies, including incidents such as the MV Dali bridge collapse and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, underscoring the devastating consequences of multiple system failures during emergencies.
How Safe Are Your Isolations? Lessons and Improvements to Isolation Management from an Operator’s Perspective
Matt Hastings, Ithaca Energy, UK
This presentation discusses the ongoing challenges and improvements in managing isolation practices, focusing on the broader context beyond equipment to include safety critical components. It explores a risk-based approach for identifying and managing isolation risks, highlighting the role of human factors and the importance of workforce engagement in achieving safer practices, despite initial resistance to change. Examples illustrate how data-driven insights and audit feedback are leveraged to enhance compliance with industry standards like HSG 253 and ensure continual safety improvements.
Perplexing Persistence of Poor Procedures
Andrew Brazier, AB Risk, UK
The paper explores longstanding challenges with procedures in industries like offshore oil and gas, emphasizing persistent issues such as inadequate coverage of foreseeable circumstances and disconnects between written procedures and actual practices. It critiques bureaucratic approaches that prioritize paperwork over effective risk management, proposing practical solutions to improve procedure usability and relevance in managing operational risks effectively.
Fire & Explosion Hazards and Assessment
What is the Impact of Dynamic Flare System Design on Cost, Safety, and Environment?
Hugo Manuel Dias Rodrigues, Siemens, Portugal
This presentation explores the impact of dynamic flare analysis on project capital cost, safety, and environmental impact in process safety equipment design. By critically examining traditional flare system design methods and introducing dynamic analysis, the study highlights significant advantages in cost reduction, enhanced safety, and minimized environmental impact.
Lagging Fires, their Implications for the Process Industry, Test Methods, and Mitigative Actions
Sixten Dahlbom, Research Institutes of Sweden, Sweden
This presentation will explore the persistent threat of lagging fires, emphasising the need for incorporating risk assessments in new plant construction. It will also introduce a novel testing method based on isothermal calorimetry and modelling techniques, offering insights from case studies, statistical analyses, and collaborative research findings to improve plant safety and reduce fire incidents.
Risk Assessment & Management II
Seeing the Invisible
Trish Kerin, IChemE Safety Centre, Australia
This paper examines the difficulty in identifying weak signals before incidents and proposes leveraging priming bias to enhance detection. It introduces a workshop approach combining failure mode assessment and incident learnings to train participants in recognising potential weak signals more effectively.
Are You Confident of the Status of the Safety Critical Systems? Can You Demonstrate Whether it is Fully Operational, Degraded, or Impaired?
Edwin Bailey, Ithaca Energy, UK
This paper explores ensuring the reliability of safety-critical systems in offshore installations, focussing on the gas detection system as a case study. It highlights the application of advanced risk-based techniques to objectively assess and classify the system's operational status (fully operational, degraded, or impaired), emphasising the importance of informed safety management decisions based on quantitative performance metrics and barrier modelling methodologies.
Using Cultural 'Warning Flags' within the Office for Nuclear Regulation
Caroline Sugden, Office for Nuclear Regulation, UK
The Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) has introduced a novel approach to identify and monitor weak signals of organisational culture across nuclear dutyholders, encapsulated in nine empirically derived "warning flags." These flags aim to enhance regulatory insights and decision-making by systematically capturing cultural indicators during routine engagements and investigations, thereby supporting targeted interventions and improving overall industry safety and compliance.
Facilitated discussion
Process Safety Management
Is it Time Process Safety Embraced Biological Hazards?
Patrick Swords, PM Group, Ireland
The paper addresses the origins and risks associated with biological agents, categorising them into four groups based on their potential for harm and spread. It emphasises the unique challenges in applying process safety principles to biotech facilities, particularly in ensuring effective protection measures against releases, distinct from traditional hazard analyses like fire and explosion modeling.
Sailing the Supertanker - Improving Process Safety Management Control and Reporting Systems
Ashley Hynds and Leanne Potter, DNV, UK
This presentation explores parallels between managing a supertanker and a major accident hazard business, highlighting the critical need for effective management, control, and reporting systems (MCRS) to ensure safety and operational success. Drawing on case studies from oil and gas exploration and multisite operations under COMAH regulations, it outlines a structured approach to enhancing MCRS, aiming to improve process safety management and leadership across organisations.
Impact of Creeping Change on Pressure Relief Devices
Robert Fitch, AXIOM, UK
This presentation examines the critical role of pressure relief devices in high hazard process industries, highlighting the importance of ensuring their suitability as processes and equipment change. Drawing on experience and case studies, it provides insights on managing risks and enhancing safety through rigorous management of change procedures.
16:00–17:15 Parallel sessions
Water
Investigation of Hazardous Area Zone Extents for Biogas in the Water Industry Including a Comparison to IGEM SR25
Tim Jones, RPS Group, UK
This paper explores the suitability of IGEM SR25 guidelines, originally designed for natural gas, in the context of biogas systems in the water industry. It compares the zone extents for vent terminations and outdoor releases between typical biogas compositions and natural gas, highlighting potential discrepancies and considerations for safety modelling.
Understanding Major Hazard Area Classification Implications of Emerging Net Zero Technologies Implemented in the Water Industry
Adriana Reyes Cordoba, Stantec, UK
This paper examines the integration of innovative technologies in wastewater treatment to achieve Net Zero carbon footprints, focusing on resource recovery and alternative energy production. It highlights challenges in adapting safety regulations, particularly under DSEAR, to address new risks associated with retrofitting these technologies into existing facilities, and presents findings from a case study on updating Hazardous Area Classification documents.
Facilitated discussion
Knowledge & Competence
Process Safety Competence - Report from the IChemE Major Hazards Committee
Helen Conlin, Urenco & Carolyn Nicholls, RAS, UK
Process Safety Lessons from Grenfell
Trish Kerin, IChemE Safety Centre, Australia
Facilitated discussion
Climate Change
NaTech Hazards – Wild Weather
Aimee Russell, RAS, UK
This paper explores natural hazards affecting high-risk sites in the UK, building on previous discussions about NaTech risks and climate change adaptation. It focuses on identifying and screening natural hazards, emphasising their potential interactions and direct impacts on industrial infrastructure, essential for comprehensive risk assessment and management.
GHG Software Modelling and Carbon Reduction
Andre Perseval, Shamrock HSE, Trinidad
The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Modelling and Carbon Reduction Project, led by Shamrock HSE, offers 'GHG Pro', a cloud-based tool designed to help industries track and reduce GHG emissions, supporting international climate efforts, especially for Small Island Developing States like Trinidad and Tobago. This presentation will showcase how the software, validated to IPCC standards, enables significant emissions reductions, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency across sectors, contributing to global sustainability goals and offering new market opportunities.
Facilitated discussion
Lithium Ion Batteries
Safety Considerations for Hydrometallurgical Metal Recovery from Lithium-ion Batteries
Sakshi Jain, University of Sheffield, UK
This presentation explores the critical safety considerations of hydrometallurgical metal recovery in lithium-ion battery (LiB) recycling, emphasising the hazards associated with processes like leaching and extraction. It aims to guide LiB recyclers and researchers in identifying and mitigating risks through best available techniques and regulatory insights, stressing the importance of early integration of safety measures to manage hazards effectively as the industry scales up.
Lithium-ion Battery Storage – New Technology, Same Old Process Safety Principles?
Ben Smith, Arup, Australia
This paper explores the intersection of traditional process safety principles with emerging lithium-ion battery technology, using case studies of incidents to highlight commonalities and lessons for safety design and operation. It argues that integrating established process safety knowledge into new energy technologies like grid-scale batteries is crucial for ensuring safe implementation and supporting the energy transition effectively.
Approaches for Li-Ion Battery Consequence Assessments
Christopher Gold, Gexcon, UK
This paper will present an analysis of the safety challenges posed by Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) batteries, focusing on thermal runaway risks and associated hazards like fires and explosions. It will discuss modelling methodologies for risk assessment and mitigation measures, aiming to inform decision-making in battery system design and layout, particularly for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS).
17:15–18:00 Flash poster sessions
18:00–19:00 Networking reception in exhibition area
Thursday 7 November
09:15–10:00 Plenary presention
Natech Events, the Risks to Process Safety and the Environment
Mike Nicholas
In his presentation, Mike will talk about Natech events, the risks to process safety and the environment due to climate change and the work being undertaken by the Chemical and Downstream Oil Industries Forum (CDOIF) to address these issues.
10:30–12:30 Parallel sessions
Human Factors in the Chemical and Process Industries - workshop presented by Keil Centre and IChemE
Safety professionals and operations personnel in the chemical and process industries often need to manage human factors on their sites. The options for getting enough knowledge to be an “intelligent customer” have, in the past been limited. There were courses in specific human factors topics (not broad enough) or higher degree courses in the subject (too broad).
To fill the gap, IChemE and The Keil Centre joined forces to create a professional development programme covering all of the key human factors topics that apply in the chemical and process industries.
This is a very interactive programme which gives delegates practical experience of using the tools and methods that will help them to understand the human factors issues facing them on their site. More importantly it will help them work out what to do about these issues. The programme is accredited by the Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human factors, so it forms a valuable stepping stone to membership of this professional body.
This workshop offers delegates a taster session of the programme. It includes an interactive exercise to allow delegates to do a high-level gap analysis to identify the human factors priorities for their sites, so there will be some practical take-aways from the workshop.
Delegates will also get an overview of what is included in the professional development programme itself.
Hydrogen Safety II
Failure of the Vacuum in a Vacuum Insulated Hose while Transporting Liquid Hydrogen
Richard Goff, HSE, UK
This presentation details HSE's experiments with liquid hydrogen for the ZEST programme, focusing on a vacuum failure in a transfer hose caused by a cryogenic leak from a mass flow measurement system, discussing the implications on safety and potential mitigations.
A Methodology for Hydrogen Vents Overpressure Assessments
Josue Melguizo Gavilanes, Shell, Netherlands
This session addresses the critical need for safe venting guidelines for hydrogen, given its unique explosion hazards and rising use in various sectors. By revisiting Dorofeev's work and applying it to realistic scenarios, the presentation offers a methodology to estimate overpressures from hydrogen gas explosions, using standard consequence modelling software and experimental evidence.
Advancing Hydrogen Safety and Resilience with a Vision for Sustainable Energy Transition
Dr Seyed Mojtaba Hoseyni, University of Sheffield, UK
This presentation explores the critical role of hydrogen in the transition to sustainable energy, with a focus on process safety and risk management. Key topics include hydrogen risk assessment, resilience to climate change, and the integration of hydrogen into existing energy systems. The session will cover advanced computational techniques for optimisation and decision-making, the resilience of hydrogen supply chains, and innovative safety solutions for nuclear hydrogen production. It will provide insights into addressing safety concerns in hydrogen technologies, offering valuable research opportunities to advance hydrogen safety and resilience in the face of emerging risks.
Approach to Fusion Safety
Omar Afify, UK Atomic Energy Authority, UK
This presentation will aim to outline the approach adopted by UKAEA to conduct safety assessments and develop safety cases for future fusion power plants.
Modelling
The Rarefaction Balancing Method in HSE’s PiRRaM Model
Andrew Newton, HSE, UK
This paper introduces PiRRaM, a model developed by HSE for predicting transient characteristics of accidental releases from pipelines carrying pressure-liquefied substances like ammonia and propane. It integrates DNV's PipeBreak model with additional physics, including rarefaction waves, to smoothly transition from saturated choked flow to incompressible liquid outflow, addressing challenges in modelling small hole limits and ensuring accuracy in mass flow rate predictions.
Digital Platform for Leakage Analytics
Kieran McDade, Cadent Gas, UK
The UK gas sector currently relies on the Shrinkage Leakage Model (SLM) for estimating emissions, but its limitations are increasingly apparent due to static emission factors and lack of granularity, hindering effective leak detection and mitigation. Cadent Gas is pioneering the Digital Platform for Leakage Analytics (DPLA), utilizing advanced technologies like methane detection and machine learning to transition to observed emissions, aiming for accurate, proactive leak detection and substantial environmental benefits, transforming the gas sector's approach to emissions management.
Exploratory Numerical Simulations of Unignited and Ignited Ammonia Releases
Jennifer Wen, University of Surrey
The study investigates large-scale ammonia releases, both unignited and ignited, using modified OpenFOAM code originally designed for hydrogen dispersion simulations. It explores scenarios of pressurised ammonia releases on land, analysing dispersion patterns and ignition potential under varying ambient conditions, including the presence of hydrogen. Results aim to inform safety considerations for ammonia bunkering operations, crucial as ammonia becomes a prominent alternative fuel in marine transport and power generation.
PolyPiRRaM: An Analytical Solution to the One-dimensional Transient Compressible Pipe-flow Equations
Andrew Newton, HSE, UK
The PolyPiRRaM model, derived for full-bore ruptures in compressible fluid pipelines, offers a simple yet robust analytical solution applicable across various fluids. It identifies universal decompression behaviour and is validated against experimental data, demonstrating its utility for safety assessments and regulatory compliance in diverse pipeline scenarios.
Engineering & Design 1
Equipment Design in an Unregulated Environment: Welcome to the Wild West
Faye Litherland, FPC - Life Sciences, UK & Simon Burwood, ERM, UK
This presentation addresses the critical need for updated guidance in the design of large-scale equipment for biological containment facilities, given the rise in biological drug approvals and industries using genetically modified cells. Combining over 50 years of industry data and government-backed risk levels, we present a framework to inform equipment design, ensuring appropriate containment for biological hazards and enhancing biosecurity measures.
Building Design and Selection for Protection of Critical Assets
Karen Vilas, FORTRESS Protective Buildings, USA
This presentation explores the design of Multi-hazard Resistant Buildings (MRBs) to protect critical assets in industrial processing facilities from various hazards, such as explosions, fires, and toxic events. Key concepts of protective building design will be introduced, illustrated through full-scale testing videos, to demonstrate how materials like concrete and steel respond to such hazards, enhancing the delegate's understanding of current MCB design best practices.
Protecting against Runaway Reactions in Semi-Batch Alkoxylation Processes
Stephen Rowe & Sam Nutbeen, DEKRA, UK, Gavin Nutbeen, GEO Specialty Chemicals, UK
This paper examines the significant safety risks in alkoxylation reactions, particularly the exothermic nature and risk of runaway reactions from ethylene or propylene oxides. Through a case study and incident statistics, it explores worst-case scenario definitions for emergency relief systems, potential simulation errors, and the importance of temperature control and agitation, concluding with a review of protection layers to mitigate runaway risks.
Turning Challenges into Opportunities: A Study of Process Safety Tier-III Events
Naseem Qamar Shaikh & Syed Aamir Abbas Shah, Mari Petroleum Company, Pakistan
This presentation offers a detailed analysis of Process Safety Tier-III events at Mari Petroleum Company Limited over a three-year period, focusing on their causes, consequences, and mitigation strategies. It highlights key areas for improvement, such as design practices, quality control, equipment monitoring, and operational procedures, to enhance safety and reduce the likelihood of future incidents.
Safety Leadership
Lifting the Veil: Honest Talk and Leadership Challenges from the Sharp End
Rachael Cowin, Legitimate Leadership, UK
This presentation will explore the unspoken challenges in process safety through anonymous interviews, revealing insights often overlooked by traditional safety audits. It aims to foster candid dialogue among delegates, offering practical leadership strategies to address shared industry concerns and enhance safety culture collaboratively.
Corporate Governance for Safety
Nick Shaw, Office for Nuclear Regulation, UK
This presentation will discuss ONR’s oversight of corporate governance for safety at nuclear licensed sites in the UK, emphasising the role of boards in ensuring effective hazard control and continuous safety improvement. It will highlight best practices and challenges observed in governance arrangements, offering insights relevant to board members, senior leaders, legal counsels, company secretaries, and audit professionals interested in enhancing safety governance within their organisations.
The Platypus Philosophy and Long Term Hazard Management
Neil Blundell, Office for Nuclear Regulation, UK
This paper introduces the Platypus philosophy as a framework for identifying and managing weak signals of potential hazards in the nuclear industry, particularly during long-term decommissioning, storage, and management of nuclear facilities and materials. It advocates adapting this framework to extend hazard horizon viewpoints to intergenerational timescales, ensuring effective knowledge retention and management amidst evolving personnel and operational changes.
Major Hazards Agenda and Strategy 28: An IChemE Update
Steve Flynn, IChemE Learned Society Committee
The IChemE Major Hazards Committee plays a pivotal role in overseeing process safety initiatives across all relevant groups within the institution. This presentation will offer an update on the committee’s strategy and its coordinated work programme. It will cover key progress and future plans in areas such as process safety competence and leadership, best practices, emerging challenges, and stakeholder engagement.
13:30–15:30 Parallel sessions
Hydrogen Safety III
A Large Scale Experimental Programme to Improve Understanding of Liquid Hydrogen Dispersion
Steven Betteridge, Shell, UK
This presentation will explore the critical role of liquid hydrogen in the energy transition, focusing on its use as a fuel alternative and energy vector, as well as the importance of quantifying hazards associated with LH2 releases. It will detail Shell's commissioned experiments at the DNV test site to gather dispersion data for validating and improving consequence models, thereby ensuring safer LH2 storage and transfer operations.
Comparison of the Heat Load from Hydrogen Jet Fires Impacting on a Target Using Different Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling Techniques
John Evans, Thornton Tomasetti, UK
As the world transitions to net zero, hydrogen is emerging as a versatile energy source to replace traditional hydrocarbon fuels. This paper compares the heat load on a target from hydrogen jet fires to hydrocarbon jet fires, using large-scale experiments and CFD modelling techniques, highlighting key differences in radiative and convective heat fluxes.
Advancing Hydrogen Safety: Integrating Computational Fluid Dynamics for Risk Assessment in Hydrogen Production via Water Electrolysis
Pablo Giacopinelli, MES International, UK
This paper explores the production of hydrogen via alkaline water electrolysis at a pilot plant, highlighting its advantages for the clean energy transition. It employs advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to perform detailed safety assessments, addressing the risks associated with hydrogen's high flammability and explosion potential, and provides valuable insights for asset protection and personnel safety.
Engineering & Design II
DSEAR – It’s Not All Glamour
Steve Sherwen, RPS Consulting, UK
This presentation will demystify the practical aspects of DSEAR assessments, focusing on common scenarios and pragmatic approaches to compliance. Delegates will gain insights into effective risk management across various industries, ensuring safety and regulatory adherence without excessive documentation.
Innovative Retrofitting of Crude Oil Storage Tanks with Aluminum Geodesic Dome and Vapor Recovery System
Bijoy Jose Verghese, ADNOC, UAE
ADNOC Offshore faces challenges with vapour emissions from its open top floating roof storage tanks, despite adherence to industry standards. This paper looks at how they are exploring a joint innovation with HMT Tanks for dome roof Internal floating with emission capture to mitigate environmental impacts and reduce emissions significantly.
Proof Testing – A Holistic Approach to Ensuring Effective Test Methods Utilising Human Factors and Technical Functional Safety evaluation
Dave Green, RPS Group. UK
This paper explores a novel approach combining Human Factors (HF) analysis and Functional Safety (FS) review in proof testing Safety Instrumented Functions (SIFs), aiming to provide a comprehensive evaluation of testing methodologies. It addresses the challenge of ensuring SIFs perform as required, offering delegates insights into reducing human errors and enhancing safety through integrated HF and FS assessments, thus benefiting professionals reliant on SIFs across various industries.
Facilitated discussion
Safety Culture
What Is Your "Aha" Moment? Driving Curiosity to Improve Process Safety Culture
Douglas Eastaugh, Shell, UK
Learning from incidents and near misses is challenging, prompting organisations to invest heavily in improving their systems, which often remain complex and time-consuming to manage. Shell developed a two-stage plan to enhance process safety culture through the Major Accident Hazard Awareness (MAHA) Site, which shares impactful stories and monthly "MAHA Moments" to build awareness. This paper will show how this plan has been developed and early successes as it is rolled out and becomes more established within Shell.
Can Curiosity Create Safety?
Urbain Bruyere, ERM, UK
This presentation discusses how the author's approach to safety has evolved over his career as a seasoned safety vice president with experience in the energy, mining, and pharmaceutical industries. Initially focused on traditional safety metrics, the author's perspective has shifted towards fostering curiosity within organizations to enhance safety culture and prevent accidents.
Rescuing Emergency Planning and Preparedness from the 'Tick Box
Nigel Cann, Arup, Australia
Arup, an Approved Assessor of Safety Cases for Australia, outlines compliance with Work Health and Safety Regulations Regulations for major hazard facilities under Comcare, akin to the UK's COMAH Regulations. They highlight gaps in emergency plans and advocate for effective community dialogue, emphasising the need for tailored emergency response plans, training, and debriefs to enhance readiness and safety outcomes. This presentation will cover specific examples of setting up an initial response strategy for onsite personnel at a PVC resin manufacturing facility and run through the events of an actual exercise and the important lessons learned from that exercise.
Can We Use AI to Turn Observations into Leading Indicators of Safety Culture and Plant Integrity?
Morgan Walters, Empirisys, UK
Boost is an AI-driven solution enhancing safety observation impact by simplifying submission, analysis, and action planning through automated hazard identification and risk prediction. This presentation will introduce the research and development of Boost from a process safety and technical perspective, finishing with a demonstration of the tool in action.
Aging Plant
Safety Investment Methods in High Hazard Industries for Projects with Declining Profitability and Finite Lifespan – the Case of Oil & Gas Upstream
Tiago Jacques, ANP, Brazil
This paper explores regulatory challenges and improvements in Brazil's high-risk oil and gas industry, advocating for integrating risk aversion into investment decisions to manage major accidents. It highlights the complexities of decision-making and operational risk management, emphasising the need for balanced regulatory frameworks and effective safety measures.
The Alternatives to Revive Safety and Integrity af Aging Oil & Gas Wells
Muhammad Abou Amad, ADNOC, UAE
This paper presents innovative zero-emission technologies for maintaining Down Hole Safety Valves (DHSVs) in offshore wells, including capillary line DHSVs, unconventional methods for control line de-plugging, and swellstack technology for severe damage repair. Successfully trialled in UAE offshore fields, these solutions have not only saved over $100 million in workover costs across 16 wells but also prevented 20,700 tonnes of CO2 emissions, marking a significant shift towards sustainable practices in the oil & gas sector.
A New Approach to PHA and SIL Re-validation: Lessons from Ageing Oil and Gas Facilities
Tom Ridout, ERM, UK
This paper addresses the challenges faced by ageing operational assets in maintaining up-to-date process hazard studies and functional safety data amidst under-resourcing and cost pressures, exacerbated by recent events like Covid-19. It proposes a structured approach to revalidate Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) and Safety Integrity Level (SIL) across oil and gas facilities, emphasizing prioritization of high-risk hazards, data streamlining, and interdisciplinary collaboration to bridge information gaps and ensure alignment with current standards.
Managing Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking in LNG Fractionation Columns
Birinengi Harry, Nigeria LNG Ltd, Nigeria
This presentation discusses the risk-based approach used over two decades to manage chloride stress corrosion cracking (Cl-SCC) in LNG de-ethaniser columns, the discovery of extensive Cl-SCC, and the mitigation strategies, including composite wraps, implemented to prevent catastrophic failures and maintain process safety. Detailed assessments and repair methodologies for affected columns will also be covered, highlighting the successful return to service while awaiting replacement.
What Makes an Effective Relationship Between a Regulator and Dutyholder? Workshop presented by Hazards Forum
There has been increasing interest the major hazards sector in recent years in what makes an effective relationship between a regulator and dutyholder. This interest stems from events such as the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident, the Grenfell fire and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. These events highlighted how factors such as blurred accountabilities, insufficient independent challenge and lack of agility in the regulatory regime can contribute to disaster.
Recent work by organisations such as the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Network for Delivery of Regulation, has attempted to bring clarity to effective regulator-dutyholder interactions, and how each can deliver their distinct roles while enabling safe and environmentally-responsible operations.
This workshop, hosted by the Hazards Forum, will explore the factors which underpin effective relationships between regulator and dutyholder, including how such relationships facilitate open and honest dialogue, while recognising the common goal of safety and environmental improvement. Further it will explore how the relationships might evolve to address the increasing complexity of technologies, processes and organisations and ensure resilience against unforeseen events.
The workshop will feature contributions from the UK Office for Nuclear Regulation and other key stakeholders. Delegates will have an opportunity to:
- Reflect on the health of their own relationships with regulators / dutyholders
- Share good practice and learning with peers across different sectors
- Learn about the latest developments in this field
- Explore how regulators and dutyholders can adapt to the challenges of new technologies and organisational models
15:30–15:45 Closing remarks
Eamon Chandler, Chair, Hazards 34 Technical Committee
"The talks are a good mix of theoretical and practical. They give you the background and the theory but it's very focused on the applicability of it. I can take what's applicable back to my company and implement it there and then."
Teri Zdrojewski, AWE
"I've learnt techniques and tools that we can use to improve our processes but also softer things around culture."
Tomas Davies, Sellafield Fuels